YEREVAN – The Armenian Foreign Ministry has publicly outlined its primary point of contention with Azerbaijan, highlighting ongoing challenges in their bilateral relations. In a recent statement covered by NEWS.am, officials emphasized key issues that continue to impede progress in negotiations between the two neighboring countries. This development comes amid renewed efforts for dialogue following years of conflict and diplomatic tensions in the South Caucasus region.
Armenia FM Details Core Dispute Hindering Progress with Azerbaijan
The Armenian Foreign Minister has identified a critical sticking point in ongoing negotiations with Azerbaijan, which continues to impede meaningful progress. According to the latest statements, the dispute primarily revolves around the status and security guarantees for the Nagorno-Karabakh region. Despite multiple rounds of talks, this core issue remains unresolved, fueling deep-seated mistrust between the two sides.
Key aspects complicating the dialogue include:
- Disagreements over territorial control and autonomy arrangements
- Security concerns for ethnic Armenians in the region
- The implementation and monitoring of ceasefire agreements
- Possible involvement of international peacekeeping forces
| Issue | Armenia’s Position | Azerbaijan’s Position |
|---|---|---|
| Territorial Control | Calls for autonomy with Armenian oversight | Demands full Azerbaijani sovereignty |
| Security Guarantees | International peacekeepers needed for protection | Prefers national security forces |
| Ceasefire Monitoring | Requests neutral third-party observers | Supports bilateral monitoring mechanisms |
Analyzing Key Differences Impacting Armenia Azerbaijan Negotiations
The primary obstacle in the ongoing Armenia-Azerbaijan negotiations remains deeply rooted in contrasting interpretations of territorial integrity and security arrangements. Armenia insists on guarantees for the protection and rights of ethnic Armenians residing in the Nagorno-Karabakh region, emphasizing the need for international recognition and security mechanisms. Conversely, Azerbaijan prioritizes the restoration of its territorial sovereignty, underscoring the return of internally displaced persons and the reintegration of these areas under its administrative control. This stalemate highlights a fundamental divergence in how both sides perceive sovereignty versus security assurances.
Critical factors complicating the talks include:
- Historical grievances: Decades of conflict and mutual distrust impede consensus on compromise points.
- External influences: Regional powers play contrasting roles, shaping negotiation dynamics.
- Displacement issues: The plight of refugees remains a humanitarian concern demanding urgent solutions.
| Negotiation Aspect | Armenia’s Position | Azerbaijan’s Position |
|---|---|---|
| Territorial Control | Security for Armenian-populated areas | Full sovereignty over all territories |
| Refugee Return | Guarantees for safe return and rights protection | Immediate and unconditional return of displaced persons |
| Security Arrangements | International guarantees and peacekeeping presence | Sovereignty-based security with Azerbaijan control |
| Political Status | Recognition of Nagorno-Karabakh’s autonomy or special status | Nagorno-Karabakh as an integral part of Azerbaijan |
![Peace on paper, claims in symbols: Armenia’s reform paradox [ANALYSIS] – AzerNews](https://europ.info/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/3027475-peace-on-paper-claims-in-symbols-armenias-reform-paradox-analysis-azernews-350x250.jpg)
